Why do people ask this question
Why just why
Step 1: Include tons of irritating stereotypes about women in your story
Step 2: Insist that the presence of even caricature-style women in your story is “diversity” and “empowerment”
Step 3: Portray real-world women as unreasonable for being offended by your portrayal of them
Step 4: Blame hysteria in a female-dominated publishing scene for blocking your opportunities
Step 5: Ignore, discredit, and mock women who try to help you understand
Listen, guys. I know that if women seem mysterious to you, it’s easier to believe lazy stereotypes about them than to give them real diversity and respect as people. But we’re not giving you a hard time about this because we just hate men and nothing you do is right. We’re simply super tired of our motivations and feelings always being tied to sex, babies, sex, shopping, and sex.
It’s not just “offensive.” It’s terribly uninteresting and incomplex. Think about the (hopefully, exaggerated) female supervillain team in this comic. Is the only way you can think of to make a woman bitter is to portray her as a sad barren witch because she couldn’t give birth? Does the only source you can dredge up for a woman’s gritty, dark past have to be tied to rape? Is it really the best you can do if your team powerhouse is simply irresistibly sexy and exploits the heroes’ attraction?
It really is a problem if female characters–even ones not as exaggerated as these–are written by men who fixate on “femaleness” and miss the mark of who they could be. If they see women as sexual manipulators, materialistic shoppers, beings who must find fulfillment through motherhood, or creatures who become interesting and motivated when men violate them, their prejudices are going to come out in what they write.
And they’re probably also going to say if women can’t handle the stuff they want to write about, it isn’t really written for them anyway. Guess what? These messages are bad for other genders too. This is why there’s a pushback against traditionally male-dominated entertainment creating female characters like this. Nobody should be writing terrible female characters and excusing men for telling each other ridiculous stories about who they think we are.
This is not to say you can never have a female character who grieves because of childlessness or has lingering pain and trauma over assault. It just gets so, so tiring when the things that motivate our gender in fiction are always about either things men think are silly or things that tie us to men or define us by men.
All that said, depressingly, having a badly written book is a lot more likely to doom your publishing opportunities than misogynistic text will. Sexist stuff gets published all the time, and even though plenty of editors (of multiple genders) are tired of it, there are also plenty who don’t even recognize it.
So yes, theoretically your spelling and grammar shouldn’t be as important as the story you’re trying to tell. And let’s face it: some of us who have fantastic stories inside us aren’t exactly masters of punctuation, syntax, and phrasing, right? Why should that hold us back, right?
I regret to inform you that this is also part of the craft and that it IS part of your responsibility as an author.
If you know your story’s amazing but you also know the compositional aspects of writing aren’t your strong suit, you are still going to be beaten out by authors who can do both, and you are still going to primarily encounter publishing professionals who expect you to have cleaned up your manuscript by yourself. They don’t want to do that job for you if you haven’t cleaned it up reasonably on your own.
So if you keep getting that comment, don’t get salty about how the story is what’s important–we know that, but we also don’t expect to dig through sloppy construction to get to it, and really excellent storytelling does incorporate the art of word choice, finesse, and polish. I’m saying this because I REALLY WANT those of you who do not excel in this to still have a chance, and I urge you to hire a professional (or ask a grammar nerd friend!) to spit-shine your manuscript. If you really do have a precious gem in there like you believe you do, that luster deserves to come out. Don’t let the publishing industry decide your work isn’t good enough just because you think they should be willing to do extra cleanup for you.
Treating your book as if it’s an exception to the industry’s rules or expecting special treatment for it is a great way to ensure you’ll never get the attention you want, need, and may deserve.
Putting it off until such time as you’re not stressed, not busy, or not distracted probably ensures that you will put it off forever.
It’s probably always going to be inconvenient or difficult to make time for writing if you are trying to carve out room for it in an already packed life. And the fact is, you’re probably going to have to do that if you ever want to find/make the time because there is rarely an ideal time to write.
That said? Do exercise self care. Don’t force yourself to do it if it’s actually making you unsafe, unhealthy, or beyond uncomfortable. Writing is supposed to be hard at times, but use your judgment. The point is to not use “I have too much going on” as an excuse. If it’s an excuse, you can get past it. If it’s the reality, take care of yourself first.
Not strictly what happened, but close enough. I’m not really uncomfortable with writing about people who want things I never wanted, and I didn’t actually write stuff I later deleted, but I did think about whether it was creepy for me to write detailed accounts of teens making out.
But considering most YA authors are adults who are just drawing on their own experiences as young adults, I probably just need to quit overthinking. And hopefully not sound like a clueless person when I try to write physically intimate scenes. I just want it to be sweet and exciting, but stopping short of, like, erotic or whatever.
(Also, meet Joanne & Kamber, the romantic couple of my NaNoWriMo novel, In Bloom. And yes, I won.)
I haven’t written anything new in a really long time so it looks like I need a kick in the ass. Guess I’m doing NaNoWriMo for the first time ever. Wish me luck.
(And come send a buddy request to swankivy if you want to connect with me. The search function seems to be misbehaving for some people so if you can’t find me, try to send me a message and add me from there.)
*laughs* Don’t worry, I’m not calling anyone out about this.
Doing this? Super common. I just wanna say a couple things about it.
There is nothing wrong with spending a LOT of time filling in your background before you start the Actual Writing. I don’t work that way, but it’s not up to me to tell people what the Best Way to prepare your writing should be.
But I caution you to understand that some people who fall into the preparation trap for years will sometimes become so intimidated and feel so overwhelmed by the preparation they’ve made that they can’t bring themselves to start writing books.
They bury themselves in this safe haven of preparing, and they become accustomed to the idea that there’s always something else still on the agenda to do before they can actually start. There’s a point where you’re going to have to either start a book or realize you’re never going to–that you’ve created a world or a scenario or a set of actors, but nobody’s ever going to live in it.
That’s okay TOO.
You can be into making up worlds and never write books in them! If that’s your hobby then that’s also fine!
But if you do have a desire to write these books and you fall into this trap of always thinking you’re not ready yet, you may never end up creating your dream. Some people think they should wait to write their masterpiece until their skills are better, but . . . you don’t get better skills without writing.
If you do find yourself in this situation and you don’t know what to do, try writing something that isn’t the book yet, to ease yourself in–write about a character outside your main focus meeting one of your characters, or seeing them on the way to their job, or maybe a group of people telling a story about something your characters did, or something unrelated to your characters but set in the same world. That sometimes lets you play around in the world without being overwhelmed by feeling like the story won’t ever live up to the hype you’ve built for it.
But seriously. If you just think you’re not good enough yet? Please write it anyway. Write things. Write something. You have to make things so you can get better at making things.
And if it turns out you really were just not ready to tackle your idea and regret doing it badly, you can enjoy falling into a whole different trap: never being satisfied with your work. -___-;
I understand why authors feel frustrated when agents (or other publishing professionals) keep them waiting, especially when it could be indefinitely. But sometimes, especially for in-demand agents, they have to think about what matters for their work. Serving their existing clients is their work. Answering authors they’re not interested in is polite, but not ultimately important to their livelihood.
As an author, it’s easy to fall into a trap of feeling slighted that you don’t get back the care and consideration you put into researching representation. You may even feel like you deserve to lash out or scold publishing professionals who don’t even do you the courtesy of a response. But at the end of the day? At least in agenting, these folks will be taking a chance on you if they say yes, and they have to be reasonably sure about the selling potential of your work since they’ll literally be agreeing to work for free if they sign you.
If you start your relationship with them making it clear that you’re Difficult to Work With and Very Entitled, you are not showing them who’s boss or making them think you’re a big shot who deserves their attention. You’re showing them that you don’t have the patience or humility you’ll need to survive in the publishing industry. Plus, just for your own good, you should never burn a bridge with someone in publishing just because they rejected something of yours. People take other positions in publishing all the time, so you never know when you might find yourself facing someone you insulted in a publishing decision, or maybe you want to offer them another project they would have otherwise taken if not for your attitude.
Anyway, short version: yes, it sucks to get ignored, but no, you are not entitled to a response (even though yes, it’s nice to get).
It’s hard to imagine that someone will leave a bad review on your book, but even the most universally loved books have bad reviews on them. The only way you’re not going to get any bad reviews is if very few people ever read the book.
This is not to be pessimistic, though–far from it! I’m not trying to stride in here with doomsaying and jadedness. The truth is that not every book is for every person, and some of those everypersons who aren’t a good match for your book will still be reading it. Even if you don’t deserve a bad review for simply not happening to fit that person’s tastes, you will get one. And it will probably hurt, but it is not a big deal overall. Setting yourself up to believe no one will crap on your book will make you much less prepared to handle it if it does happen to you.
And look on the bright side: occasional mediocre and bad reviews make it clear that your reviewers aren’t a bunch of loved ones and sock puppets.
My favorite one-star review is the one where the reviewer calls my book “garbage,” urges readers not to waste their money, and says I should not be writing books. Sometimes I go look at that review and giggle, because someone on this planet thought this was a worthwhile sentiment to type up.
Look y’all, it’s true that your stories shouldn’t just be recitations of your own life experiences unless it’s an actual autobiography. But the whole reason we make art is to communicate! And your experiences are obviously going to influence what you want to communicate about! Use your own experience as liberally as you like. It will certainly add an air of authenticity to the story if nothing else.
You might also be overestimating what looks like a ripoff. Stephen King doesn’t own scary clowns and J.K. Rowling doesn’t own redheaded families. Just make sure you look at how you’re using elements that seem similar to other authors’ work and make sure you’re not doing the same things with them. If you actually are ripping off the Weasley siblings and all you did was make them blonds, that’s going to show anyway; it’s not the superficial details that make something a ripoff. But there’s no rule that you can’t do something if you got it from somewhere that didn’t originate in your head. That’s what living in the world is about, and you can and should make art about it!